Log In

Username:

Password:

   Stay logged in?

Forgot Password?

User Status

 

Attention

 

Recover Password

Username or Email:

Loading...
Change Image
Enter the code in the photo at left:

Before We Continue...

Are you absolutely sure you want
to delete this message?

Premium Membership

Upgrade to
Premium Membership!

Renew Your
Premium Membership!

$99
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR
$79
PER YEAR

Premium Membership includes the following benefits:

Don't let your Premium Membership expire, or you'll miss out on:

  • Exclusive access to over 1,620 video demonstrations of patterns in the full bronze, silver and gold levels.
  • Access to all previous variations of the week, including full video instruction of man's and lady's parts.
  • Over twice as many videos as basic membership.
  • A completely ad-free experience!

 

Sponsored Ad

+ View Older Messages

Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anonymous
11/30/2006  6:56:00 AM
"I'm with those who believe that music is the ruler.If there is evidence that says the step begins and ends half way. My way of thinking woudn't it be better to move the step either forward or back onto the beat then maybe theses rocket scienists might become happy."

It's simply a matter of the definitions used to formally document dancing. Someone decided that, FOR PURPOSES OF DESCRIPTION, steps start and end when the feet pass.

If you want to re-write the defintions, then you have to adjust the step descriptions in the books to match your new idea of where steps start and end...
Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anon
12/1/2006  1:27:00 AM
The steps start with the music and end when the music stops playing. If you dance without music there is no way to tell if the dance is in time or out.
Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anonymous
12/1/2006  6:57:00 AM
"The steps start with the music and end when the music stops playing. If you dance without music there is no way to tell if the dance is in time or out."

Try watching video of dancers of various levels without the sound, and then come back and tell us if you still believe there is no way to tell.
Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anon
12/1/2006  3:55:00 PM
Anonymous. You just do not seem to be able to grasp things sometimes. Without a ruler of any kind is it poosible to measure. And don't say paces because paces become the ruler.
Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anonymous
12/1/2006  4:27:00 PM
"Anonymous. You just do not seem to be able to grasp things sometimes. Without a ruler of any kind is it poosible to measure."

If you had much experience watching dancing, you would already know that music is not required to dance musically. A skilled dancer can create an impression of musicality even when dancing in silence. They do this by sequencing their actions correctly, and artistically too - and as a result they are far more musical (even with no soundtrack) than a beginner slavishly hitting downbeats but without any of the interving lyraclity.
Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anon
12/1/2006  5:50:00 PM
Anonymous. But without music how can you tell if the Reverse Turn is given the right amount of time. It doesn't matter how good the dancers are untill the music is played it cannot be gaged. I can see that you don't think the music is important. The most important.
Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anonymous
12/1/2006  6:06:00 PM
"Anonymous. But without music how can you tell if the Reverse Turn is given the right amount of time."

The same way that a musician performing solo without a metronome would know if he was giving that part of the music the right amount of time: by using his or her internal sense of musicality.

Learn to be a musician while you dance - create your own music. If there is an orchestra on the speakers, you will become a member of it with your body as your instrument. If there is no orchestra, you will have to be a soloist.

Maybe you would understand better if I said that dancing without music is musical if you could watch the dancing and sing along to it.

Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anonymous
12/1/2006  7:47:00 PM
Without music there is no way that a person or persons would know if you have taken too long on any step . It even gets better performing a group.
Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anonymous
12/1/2006  7:56:00 PM
"Without music there is no way that a person or persons would know if you have taken too long on any step. It even gets better performing a group."

That is tantamount to saying that without other musicians, there is no way to tell if a soloist has played too long a note.

Which is of course outrageously rediculous!

A note or a step is too long if it puts the musician or the dancer into a position from which they cannot continue in a manner that makes musical sense. If you hold a note out and kill the music and don't have a plan for resuming, you held it too long. If you outstep your body flight and get stuck and kill the motion such that you have to muscle your way through, you have stepped to long to create music in your dancing.

Musicality is not about being a slave to the metronome, it is about creating a whole that has self-consistency as a piece of art. Each note, each step, must make sense in terms of what is around it - certainly the other notes and steps, and also the other instruments or dancers if they are involved. If no one else is involved, what you play or dance must simply make sense in the context of what you were playing or dancing an instant ago, and what you will play or dance next.
Re: If my maths are ok
Posted by Anonymous
12/5/2006  3:58:00 AM
As I said . Without music there is no dance. You have never seen , or done it yourself.That is dancing before the music starts.Can you tell me why. Have you ever seen a competition. I mean a real competition, they very often let several bars go by before starting. Would you like to tell me why it is not a good idea to even start in the four bar introduction.

+ View More Messages

Copyright  ©  1997-2024 BallroomDancers.com